Indianapolis Colts 2-2
23.2
Pittsburgh Steelers 2-2
24.8The model makes this Pittsburgh Steelers -1.5. The market has it Pittsburgh Steelers -2.5, a gap of 1.0 points toward Indianapolis Colts.
Tested against closing lines on 1,171 games since 2022, this model tracks the market rather than beating it. A large gap is a question worth asking, not a signal to follow.
Each bar is that input's contribution to the projected margin, in points, pointing toward the team it favours. They sum to 1.9 toward Pittsburgh Steelers.
| Starter | Team | Adjustment, EPA / dropback |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Jones | Indianapolis Colts | +0.000 |
| Aaron Rodgers | Pittsburgh Steelers | -0.000 |
Each listed starter measured against whoever actually played in the games these ratings were built from. Zero means the starter is the same quarterback already in the numbers.
| Percentile, 0–100 | Indianapolis . off | Pittsburgh St. off | Indianapolis . def | Pittsburgh St. def |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | 35 | 39 | 35 | 42 |
| Rushing | 100 | 90 | 29 | 26 |
| Pass cons. | 55 | 45 | 32 | 42 |
| Rush cons. | 97 | 87 | 16 | 42 |
| Pass rate | 16 | 52 | 35 | 45 |
| Pace | 61 | 23 | 13 | 26 |
| Per play, vs average | Indianapolis . off | Pittsburgh St. off | Indianapolis . def | Pittsburgh St. def |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pass EPA / dropback | -0.046 | -0.046 | +0.011 | +0.006 |
| Rush EPA / carry | +0.126 | +0.043 | +0.002 | +0.003 |
| Pass success rate | -0.002 | -0.007 | +0.008 | +0.004 |
| Rush success rate | +0.060 | +0.029 | +0.016 | +0.000 |
| Pass rate | -0.021 | +0.006 | +0.006 | +0.005 |
| Plays per game | +0.2 | -0.9 | +1.2 | +0.5 |
Opponent adjusted and shrunk toward last season. On defence, negative is good. Rest: Indianapolis Colts 7 days, Pittsburgh Steelers 10 days.