Miami (OH) 2-3
27.7
Massachusetts 4-1
26.1The model makes this Miami (OH) -1.6. The market has it Miami (OH) -2.5, a gap of 0.9 points toward Massachusetts.
Tested against closing lines on 1,148 games, this model tracks the market rather than beating it. A large gap is a question worth asking, not a signal to follow.
Each bar is that input's contribution to the projected margin, in points, pointing toward the team it favours. They sum to 2.0 toward Miami (OH), before calibration.
| Percentile, 0–100 | Miami (OH) off | Massachusetts off | Miami (OH) def | Massachusetts def |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | 79 | 22 | 42 | 3 |
| Rushing | 3 | 9 | 41 | 11 |
| Pass cons. | 51 | 28 | 29 | 1 |
| Rush cons. | 7 | 5 | 20 | 17 |
| Pass rate | 82 | 26 | 1 | 80 |
| Pace | 15 | 1 | 41 | 73 |
Higher is better on both sides — defence is flipped so the shape reads the same way. Percentiles are taken from the opponent-adjusted ratings, so a number earned against a hard schedule ranks above the same number earned against a soft one.
| Per play, vs average | Miami (OH) off | Massachusetts off | Miami (OH) def | Massachusetts def |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pass EPA / dropback | +0.270 | +0.000 | -0.049 | +0.066 |
| Rush EPA / carry | -0.079 | -0.026 | -0.055 | +0.006 |
| Pass success rate | +0.056 | +0.010 | -0.011 | +0.034 |
| Rush success rate | -0.029 | -0.036 | -0.014 | -0.011 |
| Pass rate | +0.041 | -0.045 | +0.083 | -0.012 |
| Plays per game | -2.5 | -3.1 | -3.6 | -5.2 |
Opponent adjusted and shrunk toward last season — after 5 and 5 games, a rating is still part last year. On defence, negative is good.
| Rating | Miami (OH) | Massachusetts | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo, years of results | 1253 | 1124 | -129 |
Worth 3.8 points of this projection. Elo carries what three games of play-by-play can't: years of results, so a team that has been bad for a decade isn't rated average in September.
| at Pittsburgh | 14–59 |
| vs Holy Cross | 45–7 |
| at Cincinnati | 31–35 |
| vs UConn | 24–21 |
| vs Bowling Green | 20–24 |
| at Rutgers | 37–21 |
| vs Sacred Heart | 37–10 |
| vs Stonehill | 36–14 |
| at Sacramento State | 35–6 |
| vs Eastern Michigan | 14–38 |