UCLA 4-0
21.8
Oregon 3-1
36.4The model makes this Oregon -14.6. The market has it Oregon -12, a gap of 2.6 points toward Oregon.
Tested against closing lines on 1,148 games, this model tracks the market rather than beating it. A large gap is a question worth asking, not a signal to follow.
Each bar is that input's contribution to the projected margin, in points, pointing toward the team it favours. They sum to 12.8 toward Oregon, before calibration.
| Percentile, 0–100 | UCLA off | Oregon off | UCLA def | Oregon def |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | 34 | 93 | 72 | 96 |
| Rushing | 99 | 82 | 46 | 72 |
| Pass cons. | 38 | 88 | 72 | 100 |
| Rush cons. | 93 | 81 | 39 | 82 |
| Pass rate | 28 | 90 | 94 | 20 |
| Pace | 77 | 24 | 24 | 99 |
Higher is better on both sides — defence is flipped so the shape reads the same way. Percentiles are taken from the opponent-adjusted ratings, so a number earned against a hard schedule ranks above the same number earned against a soft one.
| Per play, vs average | UCLA off | Oregon off | UCLA def | Oregon def |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pass EPA / dropback | +0.066 | +0.388 | -0.123 | -0.225 |
| Rush EPA / carry | +0.266 | +0.171 | -0.069 | -0.143 |
| Pass success rate | +0.031 | +0.119 | -0.047 | -0.095 |
| Rush success rate | +0.139 | +0.095 | -0.034 | -0.096 |
| Pass rate | -0.039 | +0.063 | -0.027 | +0.034 |
| Plays per game | -0.8 | -2.1 | -2.7 | -8.3 |
Opponent adjusted and shrunk toward last season — after 4 and 4 games, a rating is still part last year. On defence, negative is good.
| Rating | UCLA | Oregon | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo, years of results | 1660 | 1844 | +184 |
Worth 5.5 points of this projection. Elo carries what three games of play-by-play can't: years of results, so a team that has been bad for a decade isn't rated average in September.
| at California | 45–24 |
| vs San Diego State | 28–10 |
| vs Purdue | 52–38 |
| at Maryland | 54–3 |
| vs Boise State | 34–27 |
| at Oklahoma State | 31–39 |
| vs Portland State | 84–0 |
| at USC | 41–27 |