Virginia Tech 4-1
31.4
California 2-3
26.2The model makes this Virginia Tech -5.2. The market has it Virginia Tech -12.5, a gap of 7.3 points toward California.
Tested against closing lines on 1,148 games, this model tracks the market rather than beating it. A large gap is a question worth asking, not a signal to follow.
Each bar is that input's contribution to the projected margin, in points, pointing toward the team it favours. They sum to 5.4 toward Virginia Tech, before calibration.
| Percentile, 0–100 | Virginia Tech off | California off | Virginia Tech def | California def |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | 51 | 74 | 34 | 77 |
| Rushing | 100 | 17 | 64 | 20 |
| Pass cons. | 78 | 73 | 38 | 80 |
| Rush cons. | 99 | 7 | 69 | 48 |
| Pass rate | 70 | 96 | 55 | 41 |
| Pace | 47 | 74 | 82 | 47 |
Higher is better on both sides — defence is flipped so the shape reads the same way. Percentiles are taken from the opponent-adjusted ratings, so a number earned against a hard schedule ranks above the same number earned against a soft one.
| Per play, vs average | Virginia Tech off | California off | Virginia Tech def | California def |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pass EPA / dropback | +0.146 | +0.240 | -0.031 | -0.131 |
| Rush EPA / carry | +0.277 | -0.001 | -0.123 | -0.012 |
| Pass success rate | +0.090 | +0.086 | -0.022 | -0.055 |
| Rush success rate | +0.155 | -0.027 | -0.079 | -0.050 |
| Pass rate | +0.015 | +0.097 | +0.007 | +0.014 |
| Plays per game | -1.4 | -0.9 | -5.7 | -3.9 |
Opponent adjusted and shrunk toward last season — after 5 and 5 games, a rating is still part last year. On defence, negative is good.
| Rating | Virginia Tech | California | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo, years of results | 1501 | 1335 | -166 |
Worth 4.9 points of this projection. Elo carries what three games of play-by-play can't: years of results, so a team that has been bad for a decade isn't rated average in September.
| vs VMI | 73–3 |
| vs Old Dominion | 44–21 |
| at Maryland | 35–26 |
| at Boston College | 21–14 |
| vs Pittsburgh | 33–35 |
| vs UCLA | 24–45 |
| at Syracuse | 21–18 |
| vs Wagner | 49–7 |
| vs Clemson | 10–24 |
| at UNLV | 31–39 |