Hawai'i 1-4
21.0
Arizona State 2-2
35.2The model makes this Arizona State -14.3. The market has it Arizona State -20.5, a gap of 6.2 points toward Hawai'i.
Tested against closing lines on 1,148 games, this model tracks the market rather than beating it. A large gap is a question worth asking, not a signal to follow.
Each bar is that input's contribution to the projected margin, in points, pointing toward the team it favours. They sum to 12.5 toward Arizona State, before calibration.
| Percentile, 0–100 | Hawai'i off | Arizona State off | Hawai'i def | Arizona State def |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | 55 | 44 | 18 | 69 |
| Rushing | 16 | 85 | 13 | 79 |
| Pass cons. | 36 | 60 | 17 | 61 |
| Rush cons. | 12 | 79 | 5 | 85 |
| Pass rate | 100 | 78 | 74 | 4 |
| Pace | 87 | 94 | 29 | 20 |
Higher is better on both sides — defence is flipped so the shape reads the same way. Percentiles are taken from the opponent-adjusted ratings, so a number earned against a hard schedule ranks above the same number earned against a soft one.
| Per play, vs average | Hawai'i off | Arizona State off | Hawai'i def | Arizona State def |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pass EPA / dropback | +0.150 | +0.113 | +0.008 | -0.114 |
| Rush EPA / carry | -0.001 | +0.183 | +0.000 | -0.172 |
| Pass success rate | +0.023 | +0.065 | +0.007 | -0.038 |
| Rush success rate | -0.001 | +0.088 | +0.019 | -0.105 |
| Pass rate | +0.154 | +0.034 | -0.007 | +0.058 |
| Plays per game | -0.5 | -0.1 | -3.0 | -2.4 |
Opponent adjusted and shrunk toward last season — after 5 and 4 games, a rating is still part last year. On defence, negative is good.
| Rating | Hawai'i | Arizona State | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo, years of results | 1373 | 1429 | +56 |
Worth 1.7 points of this projection. Elo carries what three games of play-by-play can't: years of results, so a team that has been bad for a decade isn't rated average in September.
| at Stanford | 27–37 |
| vs UNLV | 6–21 |
| vs New Mexico State | 29–19 |
| at Wyoming | 10–27 |
| vs San José State | 16–20 |
| vs Morgan State | 70–7 |
| at Texas A&M | 20–48 |
| at Kansas | 24–17 |
| vs Baylor | 19–55 |